Much of Sunday's message, "Unexpected Announcements," focused on Jesus' visit to his hometown synagogue in Nazareth (Luke 4:16-30). When given the opportunity, he read a portion of Isaiah 61:1-2, stopped, rolled up the scroll, and gave it back to the attendant. None of this was surprising. But, after he sat down, he began his teaching on the passage by saying, "Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing."
That was unexpected! To hear someone claim that a centuries-old messianic prophecy was being fulfilled TODAY . . . I'm not sure we can fathom how shocking that announcement was. Jesus implicitly was saying, "I am the one God has anointed to do these things (preaching good news to the poor, freedom for prisoners, recovery sight for the blind, release the oppressed, and the inauguration of the Messianic Age)!
Joachim Jeremias, the great German scholar, says there was something else in this "announcement" that Jesus' listeners did not expect. Jesus stopped the reading in the middle of a sentence. He read, "to proclaim the year of the LORD's favor," but he excluded "and the day of vengeance of our God" (as well as all of Isaiah 61:3-7).
This probably upset the congregation because they wanted to hear that last part. Israel had lived in subjection to a series of world powers--Egypt, Babylonia, Persia, Greece, and now Rome. Given that, it is not surprising that the people longed to hear how God was going to take retribution on their enemies. They looked forward to the part about vengeance the way many people revel in the descriptions of judgment found in Left Behind novels. Read any of the apocalyptic writings that were popular among the Jews in Jesus' time and this will be obvious. But Jesus omitted "the day of vengeance." Why?
Although he talks about God's judgment on numerous occasions, the point Jesus seems to be making here is that God's Kingdom is not a Kingdom of vengeance, but a hope-filled Kingdom, a realm in which the poor, the blind, and the oppressed get to see their deepest hopes fulfilled!
This was a completely new insight for me, but it helps make sense of the entire story. I always have been bothered by the sudden plot twists in this account. Why did the people all speak well of him following his announcment (vs. 22), but six verses later are so furious that they want to toss their hometown hero off a cliff?
Jeremias says that the Greek used in verse 22 is ambiguous and contextual. In other words, Luke tells us that the people were "astonished at what he said," which is not surprising given his announcement that the prophecy was fulfilled in their hearing. However, Jeremias says that the language here could indicate "good" astonishment or "bad" astonishment -- it just depends on the context. Therefore, he says it should be translated: "They were all astonished at him because of the words of grace that came from his lips." Notice "words of grace" rather than "gracious words."
So, according to Jeremias' interpretation, Jesus intentionally stopped reading in the middle of Isa. 61:2 as a way of explaining the nature of God's Kingdom and that the Kingdom was open to Gentiles. This astonished the people because they always had believed that the Kingdom of God was for His chosen people, i.e. the Jews! Jesus' "words of grace" were offensive to them. This is why he then cites the stories of the Sidonian widow (4:25-26) and of Naaman, the Syrian (4:27).
From start to finish, then, Jesus used Isaiah 61:1-2 to say that:
- the Kingdom of God has arrived;
- that he is the herald and exemplar of the Kingdom;
- that he has been anointed to bring good news to the least and the last; and
- that the Kingdom is going to be much more inclusive than any of them had imagined.
Do you think any of my sermons will ever start a riot?!